The way I figure extra meta data in the database of the univererse is not really a bad thing. For only an extra few clicks you get a little more coverage for the objects of our attention. Better coverage at a minimum is just that, and if it leads to growth of our numbers, possible sales for Grant, etc. then it is only a good thing, no?
The increased meta data and cross referencing may or may not also enhance search result optimization outside of the flickr pages. Rob Still trying to come up to speed with where web 2.0 has left me, before the next incarnation comes blowing bu On Jan 8, 1:33 pm, Seth Vidal <skvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, rperks <perks....@gmail.com> wrote: > > In my deepest moment of focus on work today I started a Roado Flicker > > pool today. I looked up what I could and sent out invites but welcome > > all submissions that are on subject, i.e. Roadeo Frame, build and ride > > shots. > > Please help me flesh this out, it is way too top heavy with my own > > pictures at the moment > > >http://www.flickr.com/groups/rivendell_roadeo/ > > I've noticed each of the riv bikes seem to be getting its own flickr > group. Is there any reason not to just keep all of them in the riv > group and let the search function work if someone just wants to see > pics of a particular model? > > -sv
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
