Is anybody well versed or familiar with the crowns used on these two bikes? 
 Particularly regarding the differences between them, and their relative 
tire clearances?

The  recent Reader, #44, included a description of Riv's various, current 
 fork crowns (RC-02  through the new, Appaloosa-style RC-06) but it doesn't 
really answer my question. 

I have a first-run QB, the crown of which looks like the one at the 
following link (and also matches my Rambouillet).  But it isn't even shown 
in the Reader article.  Perhaps it's a RC-01?  Or is it the RC-02, which is 
listed as the Roadeo crown and therefore the narrowest possible option? :

original QB crown 
<http://flickrhivemind.net/blackmagic.cgi?id=2874011510&url=http%3A%2F%2Fflickrhivemind.net%2FTags%2Fcyclocrossbike%252Cquickbeam%2FInteresting%3Fsearch_type%3DTags%3Btextinput%3Dcyclocrossbike%252Cquickbeam%3Bphoto_type%3D250%3Bmethod%3DGET%3Bnoform%3Dt%3Bsort%3DInterestingness%23pic2874011510&user=&flickrurl=http://www.flickr.com/photos/25451876@N00/2874011510>

Meanwhile, later QBs and, presumably S.O.s had crowns that looked like the 
one at the following link.  It's hard to tell from photos whether this is 
an RC03 or an RC04, though I'm guessing the former.  Both have the little 
scroll detail with three dots above:

Later Quickbeam crown 
<http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3656/3577001997_71ca22526a_m.jpg>

My main question is whether or not the later QB/SO crowns had significantly 
more clearance than the earlier ones.  My reason for asking is because the 
Rosco #5 is said to be built around a surplus Quickbeam / Simple One fork, 
and I'm trying to figure out what that means in terms of real world tire 
clearance.  It is the later of the two above styles, and the bike's listed 
as having a max tire clearance of 40mm (though I suspect that's a typo and 
it really meant to say 44 or 45). But is this the conservative dimension 
Riv is required to cite as a manufacturer, or does it jive with what QB/SO 
owners have been able to do?

Though I'm at the upper end of the fit spectrum, #5 is the first Rosco 
that's looked like it will fit me, but I'm trying to figure out if it's 
something I'd use.  My QB  is the most comfortable bike I own, but I rarely 
ride it precisely because it is limited to such narrow tires.   If  #5 
doesn't improve on that significantly, then it's likely just too much 
overlap and redundancy.  #5 also shares the same, steepish 72 seat tube / 
72.5 headtube angles with the QB (which I suppose is why they describe it 
as "roadish"), has horizontal dropouts, and is bright green. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to