Hey, Doug. They were shuttled to the top and the Bomba did climb like a goat compared to the suspension bikes. I had a lot of time to check out the others bikes and the pogoing action of a rear suspension bike is something to behold. I know that there are claims that they are just as efficient as a rigid bike but I don't buy it.
On Jan 2, 12:59 am, doug peterson <dougpn...@cox.net> wrote: > Kip: > > Now you've done it - sent out a blanket invitation to a group that has > a high possibility of taking you up on it. Great report. The Bomba > probably climbed a whole lot better than the tourists double > suspension rides. Come to think of it, maybe they were shuttled to > the top, so they could ride down? Hah! > > dougP > > On Jan 1, 7:26 am, newenglandbike <matthiasbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 1, 9:50 am, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > At the risk of sounding like a tourist here, what is it > > > > with the double top tube anyway? > > > If you really are asking, it makes the frames stronger. The lower > > tube makes more of a triangle with the rest of the frame: > > >http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/bombadil/50-640 > > > Plus it looks cool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.