Hey, Doug.  They were shuttled to the top and the Bomba did climb like
a goat compared to the suspension bikes.  I had a lot of time to check
out the others bikes and the pogoing action of a rear suspension bike
is something to behold.  I know that there are claims that they are
just as efficient as a rigid bike but I don't buy it.

On Jan 2, 12:59 am, doug peterson <dougpn...@cox.net> wrote:
> Kip:
>
> Now you've done it - sent out a blanket invitation to a group that has
> a high possibility of taking you up on it.  Great report.  The Bomba
> probably climbed a whole lot better than the tourists double
> suspension rides.  Come to think of it, maybe they were shuttled to
> the top, so they could ride down?  Hah!
>
> dougP
>
> On Jan 1, 7:26 am, newenglandbike <matthiasbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 9:50 am, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  At the risk of sounding like a tourist here,   what is it
>
> > > with the double top tube anyway?
>
> > If you really are asking, it makes the frames stronger.   The lower
> > tube makes more of a triangle with the rest of the frame:
>
> >http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/bombadil/50-640
>
> > Plus it looks cool.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


Reply via email to