Yep. That's the math of it. - J
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 6:07:15 AM UTC-8, Roger wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 3:56:58 PM UTC-8, Bill Lindsay wrote: >> >> ... <http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wide+narrow+chainring&l=1>You can't run >> wide/narrow rings with multiple chainrings because if you shifted from one >> to the other and didn't hit the right kind of tooth, the chain would skate >> on the top, or fall off, or get a narrow gap wedged onto a wide tooth... >> > > I've been trying to picture one thing: do the number of teeth of the > chainring plus the cog need to add up to an even number so that the pattern > of thick/thin teeth meeting the thick/thin chain doesn't reverse to > thick/thin meeting the thin/thick every other time around? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
