Well dang, in that case! Was the seatpost jacked way up? Hoping to get some better data on the effective TT length but this has piqued my interest.
KJ On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 7:49:52 PM UTC-5, Kurt Manley wrote: > > I'm just shy of 6'5" and I rode that gold one and it fit good > > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 9:12:59 AM UTC-8, Kieran J wrote: >> >> Same here. I'd totally love one of these as a city banger. >> >> If RBW could add a "64" size - perhaps equatable to the 64 Hillborne >> dimensionally - I'd be all over it. I'm sure that would mean a few >> additional top tubes though. >> >> The "59" is likely too small for me, even though I am 6'4" and >> technically within the fit range. >> >> KJ >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 11:17:33 AM UTC-5, Mark Etze wrote: >>> >>> Let us know what Rivendell says. I would be interested in a Clem too, >>> but I have my doubts that it will fit me. I am 6'5" and already out of >>> their recommended range. It seems to me they need to add at least 2 more >>> sizes, but that would probably push the cost up. >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
