Thx, Liesl.... good input, much appreciated.... will continue to wool it over, if I should hunt for used TourSacks, or go w/ Backabikes, or, whatever......
Best, -L On Saturday, February 28, 2015 at 7:25:37 PM UTC-5, Liesl wrote: > > Hi Leslie, I used the TourSacks once on a Riv S24O attached to a baby > Hunq. They were roomy and easy to grab the pair as one unit off the bike. A > tent was easily attached to the deck with the d-rings. And they have more > volume (I think) than the Backabikes. No complaints whatever for that > application. > > Here's why I went Backabikes: sometimes I just want/need only one bag in > back. Sometimes I need to lash something on the rack that can't be lashed > using d-rings. Sometimes I want to attach my old baggins loafer, again, > which can't be lashed using d-rings. But taking them off loaded isn't a > snap as I described earlier. They are though super easy to store and don't > take up much room at all with one tucked into the other and then flattened. > (My guess is that the TourSacks would take up a fair bit more of room) > > So think about how you expect to use them and what's important to you with > respect to function. > > Hope this is helpful. Good luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
