Which method is more accurate for getting more accurate cyclecomputer data? I am mostly interested in the miles ridden being accurate, if that is even possible on a cyclecomputer. I don't know how accurate these things are. My cycling app shows very different speed reads than my cycle computer. Also, which is more accurate? An iPhone cyclecomputer app, or an actual cycle computer? I am guessing the app is using GPS, but I have heard that GPS isn't so accurate either.
*Rivcontent:* 1.Only one 650b size is available on cyclecomputers I have, so unless I have 37mm tires, I can't get an accurate read using that. 2. I find it difficult to accurately measure from ground to hub axle center accurately. Is that tire *really* standing vertical? 3. Roll out may be easier better? Lastly, if I have been using the one and only 650b x 37mm default wheel size setting on my cycle computer with my 42mm wide tires, I am guessing that the distances are being represented as shorter and the speeds shown as slower since the bigger actual tire is taking longer to make one revolution than the computer is expecting for the wheel size setting of 650b x 37mm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
