Opening the bag at the back does not allow the use of a bar tube bag which I
find to be a nice compliment to the front opening Little Loafer. The 2 bags
work really well together on a Hilsen, just like a banana bag and big loafer in
back. So I like the front opening bag because it allows more luggage options,
and I have not found riding in the rain to be an issue as the rain fly over the
zipper is a good one. Thanks, Ron F.
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Bruce <fullylug...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bruce <fullylug...@yahoo.com>
Subject: [RBW] Re: Nigel Smythe or?
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:02 PM
I've had and passed along the tweed and now have the canvas baggins on a nitto
front rack. I like the look and feel of the canvas persoanlly. Both at good
bags. They open at the front, while the new RBW bag opens at the rear, which is
a better idea IMO.
From: Tom M <tmil...@att.net>
To: RBW Owners Bunch <rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:19:52 AM
Subject: [RBW] Nigel Smythe or?
I just bought a Mark's rack, and I want to put a bag on it. RBW
currently has canvas versions of the Nigel Smythe Little Loaf, with
tweed versions due in June. I'm wondering if I should hold out for the
tweed, go with canvas, or consider either the Sackville or Baggins
bags. Anyone have experiences with any of the bags? Thanks.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
