Gino scared me away from the GB also. Instead, I gave the Challenge
Parigi-Roubaix a try and liked them a lot.

They have slightly more volume than the RT and RP, and so far have
been puncture free. They ride a lot like the RP (i.e. no RT thud),
although I've found their grip to be a little unsure in damp turns. No
crashes yet, however.

The one thing I don't particularly care for in the Parigi-Roubaix is
the herringbone tread. It makes a lot of noise, and I suspect the
herringbone pattern might account for some of the slippage I've felt
in turns. If they came in a simple slick they'd be so much better!

A

On May 13, 9:14 pm, David Estes <cyclotour...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't recall reading about this w/ anyone else, so nice to see it's not
> just me (and my hot shed).
>
> Interesting that the JBs and RPs don't do this... I wonder about the Maxy
> Fasty are like.
>
> I really want to put some JBs on there, but clearance is REALLY tight for
> that under the rear brake arch.  Tempted to try out some Grand Bois tires,
> but Gino's scared me away from them!!! ;-)
>
> I'll keep em' going for a while longer, but yeah, it's pretty nervous to see
> a crack in your tire!
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Aaron Thomas <aaron.a.tho...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yup. Same thing happened to my Ruffy Tuffies. I sent photos to RBW and
> > they said it was fairly common with RTs, but nothing to worry about
> > unless it looked like the casing was splitting as well. I retired them
> > soon thereafter, simply for peace of mind, even though they appeared
> > to have tons of tread left.
>
> > I switched to the Roll-y Pol-y and like them much better. And so far
> > neither they nor the Jack Brown greens have split like the RTs did.
> > Maybe it has to do with the thicker tread on the RTs compared to the
> > thinner tread on the RP and JB green.
>
> > If you haven't yet tried the RPs you ought to. In my experience they
> > ride way better than the RTs -- they don't have that thuddy feel that
> > the RTs do.
>
> > Aaron
>
> > On May 13, 8:51 pm, David Estes <cyclotour...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've consistently had problems with Ruffy Tuffies over the years.  Yet
> > > another pair is starting to separate along the tread:
>
> > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclotourist/3529285691/
>
> > > That said (and seen), I store my bikes in a hot shed.  It's exposed to
> > the
> > > southern sun and gets HOT in there (There is no electricty, so there
> > isn't
> > > ozone from a motor in there).  Also, these aren't brand new tires, but
> > are
> > > several years old.  Most I bought used.
>
> > > Buuuuuuttttt, I have three sets of Paselas, one set of Col de la Vies,
> > and
> > > one set of generic 650A tires in the same shed along w/ the kid's BMX
> > > bikes.  NO PROBLEMS with any of those tires, and they are significantly
> > > older (one set of Paselas is probably close to 10 years).
>
> > > Has anyone else had this problem?  The cracking/separation is very
> > > consistent, right along the "line" separating the different squares on
> > the
> > > surface pattern.  Sidewalls are fine.  Low miles on 'em, you can still
> > see
> > > the cross-file tread in the squares.
>
> > > Note:  this isn't bagging on Rivendell/Grant/Panaracer/Lance Armstrong,
> > just
> > > simply starting a discussion about what I've noticed.   Am I doing
> > something
> > > wrong in storing them, and if so, why isn't it a problem w/ other tires?
>
> > > This hasn't stopped me from buying Ruffy Tuffies, but I'm sure not
> > getting
> > > my $$$ out of them.
>
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
> > > Redlands, CA
>
> --
> Cheers,
> David
> Redlands, CA
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to