My RB-1 measures ST: 59cm C-T and TT: 59cm C-C. So I think the larger
Bridgestone's had a bit lower frames than most other frames at that
time.
I usually ride a 56-57cm road frames and 120mm stems. But with a 100mm
the RB-1 fit like a glove. The shorter stem also reduce the the wheel
flop effect from my handlebar bag.

On 26 Jan, 03:30, "Bill M." <bmenn...@comcast.net> wrote:
> The RB1 is a traditional road racing bike.  You could try the on-line
> bike fit program atwww.competitivecyclist.comfor a guess at a
> racing / sporting fit.  It returns three different recommendations,
> which they call the Competitive, Eddy and French fits.  Here are my
> dimensions as measured by my wife, and their recommendations:
>
> Measurements
> -------------------------------------------
> Inseam:                84
> Trunk:                 62.5
> Forearm:               36.5
> Arm:                   67
> Thigh:                 60
> Lower Leg:             54
> Sternal Notch:         147
> Total Body Height:     174
>
> The Competitive Fit (cm)
> -------------------------------------------
> Seat tube range c-c:   54.4 - 54.9
> Seat tube range c-t:   56.1 - 56.6
> Top tube length:       55.1 - 55.5
> Stem Length:           11.2 - 11.8
> BB-Saddle Position:    71.9 - 73.9
> Saddle-Handlebar:      54.1 - 54.7
> Saddle Setback:        5.5 - 5.9
>
> The Eddy Fit (cm)
> -------------------------------------------
> Seat tube range c-c:   55.6 - 56.1
> Seat tube range c-t:   57.3 - 57.8
> Top tube length:       55.1 - 55.5
> Stem Length:           10.1 - 10.7
> BB-Saddle Position:    71.1 - 73.1
> Saddle-Handlebar:      54.9 - 55.5
> Saddle Setback:        6.7 - 7.1
>
> The French Fit (cm)
> -------------------------------------------
> Seat tube range c-c:   57.3 - 57.8
> Seat tube range c-t:   59.0 - 59.5
> Top tube length:       56.3 - 56.7
> Stem Length:           10.3 - 10.9
> BB-Saddle Position:    69.4 - 71.4
> Saddle-Handlebar:      56.6 - 57.2
> Saddle Setback:        6.2 - 6.6
>
> For comparison, Grant would put me on a 59 AHH, which has a 58 cm top
> tube.  The Riv fit would probably have more setback, use a shorter
> stem, and have the bars much higher.  The French fit isn't all that
> far off.
>
> IIRC, my 1991 RB1 was a 56, as is my '95 Riv Road which is the RB1's
> most direct descendant.
>
> Bill
>
> On Jan 25, 11:51 am, rcnute <rcn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Certainly the geometries are freely available, but I was curious to
> > hear about folks' experiences in comparing the sizes.  Would a general
> > rule of thumb to go, say, a size down, or keep it the same?  All this
> > talk about RB-1s, etc. is causing me to consider getting into the
> > hunt.  Thanks.
>
> > Ryan- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to