On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:59 AM Martin Samuelsson <ratpoi...@gyvetre.netizen.se> wrote: > Ah! That's it! A reasonable expectation prior to xrandr, but having zero > screens is fully allowed (although arguably useless) with xrandr support. ok great, so I think we confirmed the bug then.
> Once you explained the issue, I managed to reproduce with a normal Xorg Good, this might be easier to use for some people. > For most of its life ratpoison knew nothing about xrandr and support for it > was only added "somewhat recently". The code needs to be gone through to see > which other functions have this assumption on an existing screen. This seem fairly manageable. Maybe I can begin this work. > Unfortunately I don't know the code well enough to immediately understand > whether adding all the needed null checks before each use of screens are the > way to go, or if there could be a smarter way. Me neither. Maybe it's right but not enough. I wouldn't be surprised if for example something has to be added to handle the special case of going from 0 to 1 active screens. I'll look into the implications and post my findings. _______________________________________________ Ratpoison-devel mailing list Ratpoison-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ratpoison-devel
