mmd-osm left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6635)
> the API would probably just have the attachment rendered to an html link
> around the username
Changeset discussions are currently served by openstreetmap-cgimap. It sounds
like ActionText introduces some own db persistence. Rendering would have to be
duplicated as well, which means extra effort with admittedly somewhat limited
benefit.
Hence, I would suggest to switch the Changeset endpoint
"https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/nnn?include_discussion=true";
back to Rails and take it from there.
I don't know how happy consumers like JOSM are with HTML links in a plain text
field (changeset discussions are shown in some popup there). That can be sorted
out later as well.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/6635#issuecomment-3686489062
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/6635/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
