1ec5 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5804)
Although the question posed to the LWG only cited the GDPR, the decision also
makes reference to portions of the privacy policy, including but not limited to
“facilitating the communication between OpenStreetMap contributors”. It also
considers the heatmap to be a presentation of information already available via
the profile that doesn’t present a heightened privacy risk compared to other
information there.
To be clear, I’m just going off of what has been communicated to me and not
attempting to put words in the LWG’s mouth. I can try to relate your concerns
back to them, but if you believe you have information they didn’t consider, it
might be easier to reach out to them directly.
To reiterate
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804#issuecomment-2726753639,
regardless of the fate of this option, I’d also be interested in a more direct
way of accomplishing some of what this heatmap apparently facilitates, such as
a more discreet indicator of whether someone’s activity is generally trending
up or down these days. I think approaching the profile design from the
standpoint of user experience, rather than legal compliance, would actually
open up more possibilities for addressing the sentiments here.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804#issuecomment-3638422206
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
