danieldegroot2 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6275)
> Who has verified/signed off on all this exactly? Financial details have
> presumably been checked with the treasurer? Have MWG checked the details of
> the membership tiers?
Part of [OSMF Board Meeting 2025-07-31: Potential funding source - FLOSS/fund
by
Zerodha](https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2025-07#Potential_funding_source_-_FLOSS/fund_by_Zerodha)
(pending Dorothea to add results from meeting)
for information only; I personally do not know if it is approved yet.
See also [Sharing funding opportunities for development and
OSMF](https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sharing-funding-opportunities-for-development-and-osmf/112275),
[2025 fundraising
drive](https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2025-06#Fundraising_drive)
> Not sure how @Firefishy will feel about continuing to promote the bitcoin
> address...
Up to OSMF's willingness to keep it.
> Thinking about it this will probably have to be done via
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/chef/ and not here as we don't want other
> people running this code to be publishing this without realising.
>
> Frankly the whole thing of publishing a JSON document nobody will ever read
> seems weird and I have to wonder about an organisation that requires it to
> consider applications...
Also, actual page could maybe be hosted at separate (temporary) domain (ie.
GitHub Pages).
(though not sure if it will be accepted)
---
Regarding the file, @Robot8A could ask them if needed
-
[repositoryUrl](https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6275/files#diff-47ea848c23759fc9f2124f0c673027f969e6a06820743afb7df3e9a20dda3ba6R23)
do they prefer GitHub or similar?
if so, they might allow to link to the organisation rather than single
repository.
S: [...]`github.com/openstreetmap`
> URL of the repository where the project's source code and other assets are
> available.
-
[licenses](https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6275/files#diff-47ea848c23759fc9f2124f0c673027f969e6a06820743afb7df3e9a20dda3ba6R27)
do they prefer (also) codebase licenses (when it is not solely a database)?
Anyhow, it seems they suggest some formatting
> The project's licenses (up to 5). For standard licenses, use the license ID
> from the SDPX index prefixed by "spdx:". eg: "spdx:GPL-3.0",
> "spdx:CC-BY-SA-4.0"
S: ie. `spdx:ODbL-1.0` (ref https://spdx.org/licenses/ ); assuming
-
[history](https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6275/files#diff-47ea848c23759fc9f2124f0c673027f969e6a06820743afb7df3e9a20dda3ba6R186)
empty; optional, so might be redundant.
Otherwise seems to be quoted text; someone else could look at the specification
if it is incomplete / requires modifications.
---
Sidenotes:
- OSMF also has a GitHub Sponsor page at
https://github.com/sponsors/osmfoundation
(barely used, indirect, might take part of donation); subject to OSMF's
willingness to keep it.
They have not linked
- Not to be confused with file which allows adding a Sponsor button on
repositories
GitHub allows users to add a custom sponsorship/donate/donation link button to
their repositories.
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/displaying-a-sponsor-button-in-your-repository
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6275#issuecomment-3141278486
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6275/c3141278...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
