1ec5 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#1807)
> My suggestion for next steps is to adopt the syntax `geo:$x,$y;u=$u` as a
> Latitude/Longitude input. For example, `geo:-23.55,-46.63;u=15`.
#1123 tracks accepting a geo: URI as search input.
The topic of standing up a companion website probably deserves a separate
discussion, perhaps in [osm-planning](https://github.com/osmlab/osm-planning/)
or [operations](https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/) (if you foresee
the OWG or OSMF taking an active role in this), or better yet, somewhere like
[the forum](https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/plus-codes/84969) where
people are used to discussions going off in many very interesting tangents.
Same goes with the topic of grid references inside geo: URIs. If there’s
already a standard affordance for grid references inside geo: URIs, then we
could track providing that URI as part of the Share panel alongside the
existing geo: URI, but that needs to be a separate issue. Otherwise, it
probably wouldn’t be very useful for this site to unilaterally accept grid
reference geo: URIs that no one else produces yet, so there’s some groundwork
to do outside of this project.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-2867089812
You are receiving this because you commented.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807/2867089...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev