AntonKhorev left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5706)
Do we just change the language from "accept" the ToU to "confirm that you
read", or did we go from *mandatory* acceptance to *automatic* acceptance since
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028#issuecomment-439124390?
With automatic acceptance we don't need to make any GDPR-related changes
because whenever you use the data you "accept" the ToU and get all of the
associated "rights". But obviously that's not what those who want GDPR-changes
think. EWG, for example, asked me recently if I plan to "make accepting the
terms of use a requirement". They think the ToU need to be "accepted". Now it
may be the case that what EWG thinks is not the same what the current LWG
thinks about all this.
Alternatively we can ignore all of this, forget about the ToU and use the
current Privacy policy as a guide, see
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804#issuecomment-2726403892
minus the github argument. Show some things only to logged in users and ignore
the `tou_agreed` attribute. Then this pull request is not very useful and so is
#2028 from 2019, aside from adding links to the terms pages.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706/c2755078...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
