> For example, we got here believers in inverse+rotate. Why do they think that
> it's the best option? Probably because it generally works for the standard
> layer.
I'm generally in team invert, but here for the default of no filter. And I
don't think layer-wise filters add more than they take away in removing a
two-click global map appearance change. Wherever that control will go, it
should be adjacent to the dark mode preference toggle. If all that can fit in
the context menu like proposed in #5336 (think of how layer and detail flyouts
on mobile) needs to be tested.
> We can put the options in the layer selector like #5324 (comment), but that's
> more custom javascript than we'd have otherwise.
With just three radio button "presets" (the user should be able to adapt them
to their needs) and the CSS :has() it could work without additional JS
entirely, further customization and compatibility already requires more js.
> just add a dark style in addition to the others
Dark or light mode exclusive layers don't seem right to me if they're not
complementary, but the complementary dark variants of the currently featured
layers both have flaws that I already pointed out in
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328#issuecomment-2479659101
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328#issuecomment-2480603330
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328/2480603...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
