> These are good reasons why the paginator doesn't have to be cursor-based, but
> they aren't reasons why it can't be cursor-based. So I think the
> simplification of only having one type of pagination is worthwhile.
Those were reasons for why this place is different, why it might be feasible
not to downgrade the pagination here and why there won't necessarily be any
simplification even if we downgrade it.
> Since we need a well-defined order for either approach to work, I think it's
> best to get the order defined and working with the cursor-based pagination.
Do you want to introduce a single id or or some other field (like relation
elements have) and sort by it?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5205#issuecomment-2417177221
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5205/c2417177...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
