Replying to my own comment.. just so others could maybe benefit.  After wasting 
many hours trying to figure this out.. I finally did this morning.  My problem 
was that I was sending multiple streams of records from one IP to the same 
Radiator server and it was discarding most of them because of overlapping 
sequence numbers.  The network buffer *may* have been part of the original 
problem.. but subsequent attempts to load historical data through the same 
servers I was loading live data was not working as expected. 




On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Jared Watkins wrote:

> Hello.. 
> 
> I'm attempting to load some old cdr accounting data into my dev environment 
> through Radiator and I'm seeing a problem with dropped records.  I saw the 
> note in the doc about increasing the SocketQueueLength and I've done that 
> both in the Radiator config and in the OS... taking it from 128k to 12M. 
> (overkill?) but even with that... every time I reload the same days data from 
> disk.. I'm getting more and more records into the DB for that day. It's not a 
> big difference.. maybe 200 more recs out of 18k each time I resend the data. 
> I'm using the unique recordid as the primary DB key to avoid duplicate 
> entries.   I'm not seeing any errors or timeouts on the client side.. which 
> tells me the packets are being acknowledged as received.... and I see a 
> continuous stream of packets to and from the client.. but when tailing a 
> debug log from radiator where I should see one log entry for every record.. I 
> see periodic pauses in the log... sometimes of a few seconds. 
> 
> Of course this isn't a normal level of activity... this is me blasting the 
> server from cdr files stored on disk. Any insight on what else I might try 
> here? 
> 
> Thanks,
> J
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radiator mailing list
> radiator@open.com.au
> http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

_______________________________________________
radiator mailing list
radiator@open.com.au
http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Reply via email to