On 01/10/2011 05:48 PM, Johnson, Neil M wrote:

> TTLS-MSCHAPv2 works.

Great!

> I was confused. I thought ttls-eap-mscahpv2 was ttls-mschapv2.

Well, I did not notice this either until I checked wpa_supplicant doc
and took a peek at the code. Only then I realised that EAP is not
necessary and plain MSCHAPv2 over TTLS tunnel works too and that is the
common case.

> Still, it be nice to know why the inner identity is being found.

I think what I wrote about checking both EAP Identity and User-Name
attribute might be useful if someone, for some reason, wants to use
EAP-Someting over TTLS tunnel. But I guess it is quite infrequent. TTLS
RFC states that CHAP, MSCHAP and MSCHAPv2 must include User-Name but
there is no such requirement for EAP.

-- 
Heikki Vatiainen <h...@open.com.au>

Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS,
TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP,
DIAMETER etc. Full source on Unix, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, VMS,
NetWare etc.
_______________________________________________
radiator mailing list
radiator@open.com.au
http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Reply via email to