Thank You for explanation. Does proxy will work with DIAMETER protocol too?
br, Arthur > The frontend simply proxies the requests with an "AuthBy *BALANCE" to the > backends where the processing occurs. > > You would set up multiple backends on different port numbers such that all of > your processors are working in a similar fashion. > > > >> OK, >> it's clear now. Thank You. >> >> >>> The parent process does not handle any RADIUS requests itself, so although >>> you have increased the debug level for the parent process, the children are >>> still running at Trace 3. >>> >>> >>> >> BTW, about Farming. It's unclear for me from CPU load aspect. My >> Radiator has big load (with 80% of peak hour), but only a few of CPUs >> loaded and one instance of radiusd has big load: >> >> top - 12:36:56 up 94 days, 12:59, 1 user, load average: 0.42, 0.41, 0.42 >> Tasks: 184 total, 2 running, 182 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie >> Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu2 : 1.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu3 : 21.9%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 76.5%id, 0.0%wa, 1.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu4 : 15.0%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu5 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu6 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Cpu7 : 0.0%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, >> 0.0%st >> Mem: 6096408k total, 1834452k used, 4261956k free, 212452k buffers >> Swap: 3998392k total, 0k used, 3998392k free, 1363816k cached >> >> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >> 10436 root 20 0 113m 34m 3516 R 37 0.6 373:18.71 radiusd >> 10435 root 20 0 113m 34m 3552 S 3 0.6 13:46.54 radiusd >> 10437 root 20 0 87460 26m 2744 S 0 0.4 0:00.02 radiusd >> 10438 root 20 0 87328 26m 2696 S 0 0.4 0:00.03 radiusd >> 10434 root 20 0 72804 23m 1100 S 0 0.4 0:00.09 radiusd >> >> How to achieve smooth CPUs and radiusd load? >> >> >> br, >> Arthur >> >> _______________________________________________ >> radiator mailing list >> radiator@open.com.au >> http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator >> > > > > NB: > > Have you read the reference manual ("doc/ref.html")? > Have you searched the mailing list archive > (www.open.com.au/archives/radiator)? > Have you had a quick look on Google (www.google.com)? > Have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets), > together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening? > > _______________________________________________ radiator mailing list radiator@open.com.au http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
