Hi
>>>To assist us in dealing with the Cisco NAS-Port problems, it would be very
>>>helpful if you could send us copies of the accounting requests and the
>>>corresponding SNMP query results so we can see the differences. If you could
>>>also tell us what version of Cisco IOS you are using that would help too.
>>It is ver. 12.1.1.3
>>You'll see trace 4 logs attached.
I checked the queries with Cisco and they seems ok. But now I have the same problem with Ascend (running ver 8.0.2)
It sends NAS-Port value, but if I check it with snmpget ...... .iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.529.12.2.1.3.{NAS-Port} I don't get any result or wrong result. The result which I need is somewhere else.
In the same time i notice that .1.3.6.1.4.1.529.12.3.1.4.{Acct-Session-ID} brings correct value.
Is there any way to use this? Or am I doing something wrong?
>Thanks, but I need an additional piece of information and that is the results
>of the SNMP query that Radiator runs to check the NAS. You can run that query
>by hand when there is an entry in the session database, so we can see what is
>reported. The problem is that there is a difference between what the Cisco
>reports in radius packets and what it reports in SNMP queries, hence the
>difficulty in enforcing simultaneou use.
>BTW - I found this in your log file:
>Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP3592000
>I think you have something amiss in the specification of your reply attributes.
Yes.
Thanks
>thanks for your assistance
regards
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, Interbiller, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc, etc.
Available on Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
radius.cfg