On Thursday, April 08, 1999 10:29 AM, tom minchin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Arnie Roberts wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 07, 1999 3:13 AM, tom minchin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >
> > > * yes it's bad the packet is being lost, but RADIUS should recover from that.
> >
> > How??
> > RADIUS runs over UDP. Surely this is a problem with RADIUS not Radiator.
> >
>
> Radiator is detecting the repeated Access-Request as a duplicate and ignoring
> it. It should, according to RADIUS, resend the Access-Accept to the NAS not
> discard it as obviously the NAS didn't get the first one as it's stilling
> asking.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see. Sounds like you need to set DupInterval to 0 or else fix the problem with
the newtwork which causes it to lose packets.
I still think this is essentially a problem caused by the limitations of the Radius
spec.
DupInterval is a Radiator "addition" to the spec which overcomes the limitation.
Arnie
===
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
