It's been a while since I created a new package, but as of ~1 year ago, another advantage (or perhaps the same, from a different angle) of the multi-collection format was that it allowed third parties to add modules to the collections I defined.
Eric On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 1:58 PM 'Joel Dueck' via Racket Users < racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I’ve always used the single collection format [1] in my packages. > > However, I see a lot of package authors will use a multi-collection format > and split the library, documentation and maybe tests out into separate > collections. > > What are the benefits of splitting the main library and its documentation > into separate collections? > > [1]: > https://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/Package_Concepts.html#%28part._concept~3amulti-collection%29 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/6ea9f50e-0d4f-4800-bc17-d31979a614cfn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/6ea9f50e-0d4f-4800-bc17-d31979a614cfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAORuSUwGH0vAZvx-Y7jQNEqzwhks8X-%2B0y4t_m6Nc_%3DTWW45YA%40mail.gmail.com.
