> A shortcut to answering my question would be to tell me that `with-quasisyntax` in the following paste already exists: http://pasterack.org/pastes/48885
Without taking a detailed look, is there anything about with-quasisyntax that with-syntax <https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stx-patterns.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fstxcase-scheme..rkt%29._with-syntax%29%29> (https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stx-patterns.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fstxcase-scheme..rkt%29._with-syntax%29%29) doesn't do? I would also highly recommend syntax-parse and it's various abstractions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5c89cbd3-0b4a-4d60-ab23-6456225b4a80n%40googlegroups.com.
