The best thing is to use a semaphore instead of a mutable reference. If you can't do that, then I think that you should combine the mutable reference with a signaling semaphore. If you can't do that, then I can't think of anything but a poll.
-- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io Vincit qui se vincit. On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:59 AM David Storrs <david.sto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Suppose I have a function that tests for some condition, e.g. > > (define current-user (make-parameter #f)) > (define (current-user-set?) (not (false? (current-user))) > > What is the best way to say "wait until 'current-user-set?' returns true"? > I've been through the Events chapter in the Reference and nothing seems like > a great fit. I could do polling via sleep or alarm-evt but that seems > inefficient. Is there a better way? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKocbPgjcFAF_o2g6mhZBEH8PpeGyJ4CwznKc3DZkMjY%3DGw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJYbDanE4zqgFRAFSYs4kdLzjKf9xg3xi0JMNU7VmFREstNBgQ%40mail.gmail.com.
