On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 19:29, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu>
wrote:

> It doesn't print that way because that wouldn't turn back into the
> original value when evaluated, since it's quoted.
>

Is there any other way?
If not, I might consider the possibility of having a struct type for each
of those ugens, but as I was saying in my first mail - is that sensible?
That would mean declaring ~600 struct types.

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 20:52, Yury Bulka <setthemf...@privacyrequired.com>
wrote:

> Wow, so great to hear the a SuperCollider client in Racket is on the
> horizon:)
>

Well, slowly and from the hands of an amateur programmer. But if this
mailing list and the SuperCollider mailing list are patient enough with me,
we might have one in a few months :)
So far, SynthDef compilation is mostly finished. I haven't gotten into OSC
messaging yet, which is the other big half.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAN4YmRFsoUOjCbjm9ey5b%3DT2AHa7LngwtJjyAtnw-airnuGMUw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to