On Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 5:49:43 PM UTC+1 hen...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:16:16PM -0800, unlimitedscolobb wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether macros could be of use here. I'll give it a think. > > Idea: Have a look at parendown > https://docs.racket-lang.org/parendown/index.html > > It would let you write > (compose f > (compose g > (compose h k))) > as > ( compose f > #/ compose g > #/ compose h k > ) > > Which at least cuts down on the heavy indentation and parenthesis pile-up. > > Interesting, thank you. I haven't yet tried parendown, but the more I see mentions of it the more likely I'm to try it out :-) > A macro might be able to generate either of the above from > (comp f g h k) > . > Indeed. I'm re-reading the docs on macros and I think I see a clean and clear way to achieve what I need. I'll post my attempt as soon as I get the time to write it. - Sergiu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/94f9eb1e-00bf-4ac7-81bd-24dc4235d8a0n%40googlegroups.com.
