Hello,
I’m suspecting I’m getting a little turned around by phase levels and where
`require` comes in: it seems to be impossible to write a macro that expands
to a valid `require` (it doesn’t throw an error, but the functions aren’t
defined either). What am I missing? At what phase level does `require` do
its magic? And can I tap into this magic from within a macro?
An example to illustrate my point:
```
(define-syntax require-distributed ()
((_)
(require racket/place/distributed))) ; could be anything, really
(require-distributed) ; expands and runs fine, but no symbols :(
```
I know that this is somewhat of an odd thing to want, and I understand if
it’s not possible.
V
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/a49ab428-ae49-45ce-9d16-8a77d27f5a85n%40googlegroups.com.
