Hi all. I wonder if such a thing exist or even possible? Question triggered 
by the trade off between "compile slowly now to run fast later" vs "start 
fast". Racket like other modern(ish) Scheme derivatives appear to have 
settled on being in the former camp. Is there anything in the language that 
would make interpretation infeasible (semantics?) or unreasonably slow 
(expansion?)? Chez sports an interpreter with some limitations. I think 
Gambit ships one although I'm not sure how performant that one is. IIRC 
Guile recently got something. What about Racket?

Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/dd9dd201-5826-4453-8fbe-babc0c477dcdo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to