At Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:24:37 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > - on Racket BC, operations like `+` do indeed block
... which mixing, say, fixnum and flonum arguments, but not when operating on all fixnums or all flonums. In this case, it may be the `in-range` with flonum bounds that results in `+` with fixnum 1 and a flonum. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200617083640.285%40sirmail.smtp.cs.utah.edu.
