Hi Stephen, Il giorno lun 8 giu 2020 alle ore 16:34 Stephen De Gabrielle < spdegabrie...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Catonano > > Did you resolve this > > Kind regards > > Stephen > > > No, I didn't resolve this the original paper Andy Wingo refers to uses Haskell to express this operator and I can't read Haskell and I'm not willing to learn My idea was to use some drawings of trees made in svg and maybe animations of trees being processed with the original operator (the one expressed in Haskell) There's a scheme implementation, in my idea I would have traced it while running and I would have prepared a graphical representation In order to explain the operator to myself, before than to anyone else But frankly it's a lot of work If this thing is expressed in such a poor way, maybe its authors are not interested in this idea being a thing I account this to the cultural debt of the scheme community -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJ98PDy1fUw%3Dba6FrpNukiOSMf8XFf_PEFt2hmik%3D%2Bvt9i2-mg%40mail.gmail.com.
