On Fri, May 1, 2020, 11:25 PM Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> $0.02, whitespace sensitivity is just bad ux in the long run. haskell can
> get away with it more than python because haskell can be written more
> concisely i feel than python. but even in H it is sorta unfortunate.
>
> i like how iirc clojure uses sexprs but allows other kinds of parens,
> fairly arbitrarily.
>
> (foo '{2 3 4} '[a b c])
> same thing as
> (foo '(2 3 4) '(a b c))
>
> so humans can make some parts stand out a little bit differently.
>
Racket does the same thing. (), [], and {} are all equivalent as long as
they match consistently. (i.e. you can't do '(] because that doesn't match
consistently.)
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJ7XQb67vFEX7D0hHOxJXVG6344ngYU1%3DtmmQ0m6%3DVijqODEQw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJ7XQb67vFEX7D0hHOxJXVG6344ngYU1%3DtmmQ0m6%3DVijqODEQw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKocmAWMH4TUdJEPCBTPSSe8qEeaixNybDAsERMJaVOBDhQ%40mail.gmail.com.
