hi, just now I'm debugging a regular expression and trying to understand why
this:
> (regexp-match-positions #rx"[-+][0-9]+" "-0500")
'((0 . 5))
works as I expect, whereas this:
> (regexp-match-positions #rx"[-+][0-9]{4}" "-0500")
#f
doesn't. (My naive opinion is the second expression should return the same
answer as the first.)
Wondering whether I could discover for myself whether this is a known issue, I
found directly:
https://github.com/racket/racket/search?q=regexp&type=Issues
or perhaps something like this:
https://github.com/racket/racket/search?q=regexp+type%3Aissue&unscoped_q=regexp+type%3Aissue
is better, but either way I'm quickly pretty lost in terms of deciding whether
this relates to a known issue.
I'd appreciate advice on either question.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/061c9f78-0ffe-4a5e-be12-10518d70c413%40googlegroups.com.
