Hey Guys,
I do not see how to apply pattern matching to this problem.
Using for/list as below makes the most sense to me and I do not see how to
fit in pattern matching
; [List-of [List-of String]] -> [List-of Natural]
; produces list of number of Strings per item in a llos
(check-expect (words-on-line empty) empty)
(check-expect (words-on-line (list empty)) (list 0))
(check-expect (words-on-line (list (list "22" "rr" "ff") (list "22" "rr")))
(list 3 2))
(define (words-on-line llos)
(for/list ((los llos))
(length los)))
Can I get a hint?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/28814482-5ad2-4b8f-9e40-c0b83ffcb30c%40googlegroups.com.
