On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two or > even three editors. > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of those two, myself. That was after you had posted your Venn diagram. I was mostly using DrRacket before but now I am mostly using Emacs. I still like the features in DrRacket for tracing definitions and use it for that. Also, I have two monitors and Gnu Emacs in the terminal does fine for splitting the screen on one monitor but not so well across two monitors. So, on the occasions where I want another file open on my second monitor, I have been using Emacs on the main monitor but DrRacket on the second. I probably could use Emacs on multiple monitors if I used one of the Mac specific GUI versions. I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these over another? I also have set up a Racket development environment in Termux on my Android tablet. Since there is no version of DrRacket for Android, I am exclusively using Emacs there. Having said that, I haven't actually done any more yet than test it to see that it works. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/46BF6E5F-A613-4FF5-9C9B-C1526B31B54A%40biomantica.com.
