Showing that you defend a copyright is not just for any legal status of
it, but so that others take it seriously (e.g., are less likely to see
what they can get away with, which was a significant problem for a while).
Also, intentionally violating (as far as you know) a popular open source
license, in some maneuver, seems disrespectful of a foundation of all
open source projects. In play are both legal constructs and social
contracts -- what terms people buy into, when they participate in an
open source project. We compromise these at our peril. Process is our
friend.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/942c5bab-00b5-d221-4a50-eda361b1cfc0%40neilvandyke.org.
