Well, my novel draft made it through Scribble, but not intact.

(1) Some of the @ commands I use are intended to cause conditional 
inclusion of their contents, dependong on a command-line arameter (which  
haven't yet implemented in scribble.  This is so I can keep my athor's 
notes about the text in the text itself, read them while looking at 
drafts, but have them removed for the final reader's copy.

I've tested this by defining one of these operations (@snip) to delete 
all its contents all of the time, and that works.  (Command line 
dependence will come later).

But it is not possible to snip out entire sections.  In particular,
   @snip{
      @include-section{"author-only-section.scrbl"}
   }
fails, complaining that there's a nested require. 

Is there some way around this?

(2) When I use include-section from the main file, the actual text in 
the main file appears first, and the included files are all saved up ane 
emitted after the text in the main file.  I expected the sections to be 
included where the include-section command was instead of being saved to 
the end.

Is there some way to force immediate rather than deferred inclusion?  
Text that is intended to frame a section, before and after, no 
longer does.  The only way around this seems to be to put the after-text 
into the section itself, which is *not* the structure I want.

Of course one ot the uses I have for this is for author-only text that 
talks bout problems with the section, rather than being contained in 
teh section itself.  But I can imagine it being useful in text intended 
for the reader as well.

Wrapping text around sections makes a real difference if each section is 
compiled to its own HTML page.

(3) This one isn't a real problem, but is an annoyance, since I can 
instead make major changes to the source files and make them work.

When the scribble source file is already formatted in the style normally 
used in English books, with a few spaces (in my case 5) starting every 
paragraph and no blank line separating them, the division into 
paragraphs is completely ignored and everything is run together into one 
paragraph.  Is this actually intended?  Yes, I agree it seems to be 
according to spec, because there aren't any blank lines between 
paragraphs, just intentation on the first line, but is this actually 
useful for any purpose?

-- hendrik

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190801112544.5rv3mdrutjci7dif%40topoi.pooq.com.

Reply via email to