In cases like these, I’d just define a helper file |my-commands.rkt|,
and |@(require "my-commands.rkt")| Those helper commands can use
standard Racket syntax, since they’re likely to mostly be
standard-looking Racket functions, and they can |(require
scribble/whatever)| libraries if they need to call some of the scribble
markup functions. You can also use standard |provide| forms in
|my-commands.rkt| to provide just your helper functions.
On 7/31/19 10:36 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:40:34PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:04:38PM -0400, Ben Greenman wrote:
Now for the next problem. If I @include-section, an occurrence of
redtext in the included section is recognised as an unbound identifier.
Evidently I need to say something to get included sections to inherit
bindings fro the main file.
`include-section` is much closer to Racket's `require` than TeX's `include`
I see.
So the included section has to do its own definition of redtext, or require
it from a common source.
IT WORKS NOW.
At the beginning of every inclided file (and there are more than fifty
of them) I have to place the lines
#lang scribble/base
@(require "pfx.scrbl")
where pfx.scrbl contains the definitions of my new @ commands.
I'm in the process of converting a huge multifile manuscript from
another adhoc and incomplete document compiler that also uses a
(partly incompatible) version of @-markup. Now that the performance
aspects of scribble have been dealt with, it's feasible. I'm looking
forward to using it.
-- hendrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/e9e61fdd-48f7-d8fa-e083-8eafe7bef2ac%40ccs.neu.edu.
