This is going to be easier than I thought. Nobody told me (mostly-equal? Racket Scheme)
Racket seems to be a superset of the Scheme I know, with more restrictions on mutation. I was conservative about mutations. My worst habit was using "reverse!" and "append!". They are used in stereotypical ways or hidden behind a layer of data abstraction, so they won't cause trouble. I need to box some stuff. Many of the things I used macros for are now natively supported. Old style macros are still there until I learn the shiny new hygienic macros.
I have to relearn the programming environment - editing, debugging, and packaging. I want to know what is underneath the surface. As someone told me, I really should learn git.
-- Josh Rubin jlru...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/b53ecb25-76d1-049d-ced0-39cb1e435903%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
