This is going to be easier than I thought. Nobody told me (mostly-equal? Racket Scheme)

Racket seems to be a superset of the Scheme I know, with more restrictions on mutation. I was conservative about mutations. My worst habit was using "reverse!" and "append!". They are used in stereotypical ways or hidden behind a layer of data abstraction, so they won't cause trouble. I need to box some stuff. Many of the things I used macros for are now natively supported. Old style macros are still there until I learn the shiny new hygienic macros.

I have to relearn the programming environment - editing, debugging, and packaging. I want to know what is underneath the surface. As someone told me, I really should learn git.

--

Josh Rubin
[email protected]


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/b53ecb25-76d1-049d-ced0-39cb1e435903%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to