Thanks for working on this, but Racket's `thread` construct is not parallel (in the sense that you will not see more than one CPU active on your machine at a time with code that uses `thread`).
Check out places and futures for alternatives that do support parallelism. Robby On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:52 AM Dexter Santucci <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I made concurrent (multi-threaded) versions of map, andmap and > for-each for Racket: > > https://github.com/DexterLagan/pmap > > Because I'm a little slow and lazy, I haven't checked packages for a > proper version. > > If this isn't too much asking, can somebody give me some feedback? > The andmap implementation is naive but I haven't found a way to break a > map of threads apart from using exceptions. If anybody can suggest a > more elegant and format version, I'm all ears. > > Dex > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
