> > > If others think that (1) and (2) are worthwhile doing, I will submit a PR, > so > we can discuss the API an implementation over something more concrete. I > am > open discussion for points (3) and (4). > > For the more broader color map changes, if the improvements are split up in > small incremental tasks, I will be happy to help out, as time allows. > > 1-4 sound like a solid foundation. If it was possible to have an API point where a user can add (and then select) their own colormap, that would be lovely. This would allow the described machinery to "just work" if I want to explore the generation and use of colormaps other than those in the library.
I've got an "all-puce" map in mind... Thank you for the work and effort. Cheers, Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
