You should include Danny Yoo's Brainfudge in the "stand-alone languages with non-s-exp syntax". https://www.hashcollision.org/brainfudge/index.html
Justin On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:15 PM Stephen De Gabrielle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 18:00, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Mar 1, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Matthias, >> > (or anyone else who is available to answer :)) >> > >> > I'm trying to get my head around the range of possible languages in Racket. >> > >> > You got me thinking how many languages seem to have embedded little >> > languages. >> > I was wondering how they fit into your categories of languages? >> > >> > 3. The nature of languages ranges from >> > — stand-alone languages with ugly syntax (example: datalog) >> > — #lang stand-alone DSLs (config, scribble) >> > >> > Does '#lang video' fit in this group? >> >> Yes. >> >> >> > >> > — #lang language mixins (s-expr, 2d) >> > >> > Do regular #px""/#rx expressions fit in this category? >> >> I don’t understand how #px is similar to the s-expr or at-expr or 2d #lang >> mixins. I am referring to lines such as #lang at-exp scribble. >> >> [...] >> p.s. In my mind, format and regexp-match (and similar functions) are >> interpreters for programs in DSLs that are written down as strings. That’s >> my opening slides for HtDL (from last year). > > > The example from Greg Hendershot, below, gave the impression they were like > at-exp and the #2dcond syntax extension seems to fit the same pattern as #px > , but I see what you mean about regex-match and format being interpreters. > @pregexp{\d\.\d} ; #px"\\d\\.\\d" (from > https://www.greghendershott.com/2015/08/at-expressions.html ) > (I do use that trick to make regexp more readable - at-exp is great) > > leaving aside my confusion, my goal here is to a page to the racket website > that showcases an selection of languages made with Racket, that is better > than a search of things that define a #lang > > #lang stand-alone languages with non-s-exp syntax (I'm inclined not to > include 'ugly syntax' on a PR for the racket website) > > Algol 60 > Datalog > Scratchy > ProfessorJ (deliberately included as ~30% of job ads in the UK specify Java) > Rash: The Reckless Racket Shell > Riposte > > #lang stand-alone DSLs (config?, scribble) > > (I don't know a 'config' lang apart from #lang info) > > Scribble > Hackett > Heresy > Lindenmayer > Parenlog > Pie > Video > > > #lang language mixins (s-expr, 2d) > > #lang s-exp [module] > #lang 2d racket > #lang at-exp > > embedded DSLs with mostly coarse-grained interactions with Racket (redex) > > Redex (require redex) > [need to identify another example] > > > embedded DSLs with fine-grained interaction with Racket (the language of > class syntax; syntax-parse: the pattern and templated languages, which > interact via syn-pattern vars) > > (require racket/class) > syntax-parse > syntax-case patterns and templates etc. > > > string interpreters > > regexp > format > > > Languages with other targets > > Asi64 > Pollen > Scribble (?) > Racket-script > > > Are these good categories? > > Kind regards, > > Stephen > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
