I was wondering the same, thought maybe `for` or `for-each` on an input stream since those dont accumulate into a data structure?
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 8:25 AM Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The main difference, as has been pointed out before, is that Python > generators are more common as an idiom for solving problems that in > Racket would typically be approached differently. > > This piqued my interest. Can you elaborate a bit or give an example? How > would one approach things with Racket differently? > > I imagine some input, that is too big and should be handled one element > at a time instead. How would one do that in Racket, when not using > something comparable to a Python generator? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/racket-users/MfhbwI5QuPw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
