> On Feb 19, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Brian Adkins <lojicdot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Awesome - that did the trick. I'm confused as to why it helped to inject STR > into the lexical context - it ends up being just a string, and it was working > fine with respect to loading the template. I would think the fix would be to > inject include-template into the lexical context. I suppose it must have > something to do with how the include-template macro is dealing with that > argument.
When `with-syntax` finds a datum (like a string) on the right side of a pattern-binding expression, it silently coerces it to a syntax object with the macro-definition scope attached (which in this case, was not the right scope). Ordinarily you wouldn't want to move `include-template` into the lexical context of the calling site, because you're relying on retaining the binding it has at the macro-definition site. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
