On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 08:04:36 -0700 Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> It's possible that the someone talked to me. I recall offering the > opinion to someone at RacketCon/ICFP/StrangeLoop that Racket would not > be as fast as Julia for the case that Julia is designed for --- > specifically numerics --- due to the way the Julia compiler > specializes programs to numeric types and hands off to LLVM as its > back end. Hey, but that's not fair!! The 'quote' is pulled out of the context. :-( > But I agree with others that Racket is likely to be faster on most things. Thank a million!! It does help me very much to make a decison. ;) Sincerely, Gour -- Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice, O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion — at that time I descend Myself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
