One very frustrating thing for me is the inconsistency between which sexp xml representation is the "right" one, sxml or xexpr. Different tools support different things, and thus don't interoperate when they easily could have. I wish the Racket community could collectively make a decision and "deprecate" one of them.
IMO, it makes more sense to have sxml be the "right" one, since it has wider user outside of just Racket, and there are some much nicer tools available for it: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sxml-intro/index.html#%28part._.Tools%29 (That, and I find the @ property syntax a bit easier to follow, but that barely matters.) Possibly opening a can of bikeshed, - Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
