I feel like every traditional term is subject to "how many angels can dance on the tip of a parenthesis?" debates.
For example I prefer "function" but if we rename procedure-arity to function-arity there will be people who complain that 1 is the only correct value. :) There are terms like "callable", but we have tail elimination. "callable-and/or-jumpable" seems like a name that is both more accurate and more horrible. Something like "apply-able" or "applicable" seems better? But we have things like structs with prop:procedure, instances of which can be applied. So. Yeah. :) I agree with you, George, what's most interesting is the possibilities and the history trying them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
