After learning more Haskell I've been playing around with match and define/match, and I'm wondering if there's any particular reason to prefer more traditional Scheme forms over match (I vastly prefer match in most cases). Glancing at the match module it looks the process of expanding a match clause is pretty intricate, and the documentation mentions that match lacks the time complexity guarantee of case, but beyond that it's not immediately clear whether match imposes some unacceptable overhead or etc., or to what extent it does if so.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
