> On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Although Racket-on-Chez is not yet ready to replace the existing > implementation of Racket for most purposes, it should generally work > now --- and it might even be useful for some purposes. Many, many > details have to be right for Racket-on-Chez to assemble itself into a > snapshot distribution, so this is a significant milestone.
Thank you for the all your effort & hard work to get Racket-on-Chez this far. This week, I've gone over to using the Racket-on-Chez snapshots exclusively. They are stable & fast enough for everything I do with Racket. There are bugs, of course, though so far all small. And Matthew has been fixing them as fast as I can file them. For that matter, if you've ever wondered "what can I do to improve Racket-on-Chez, without being a 1337 h4x0r?" I suggest that you also use the snapshots and file bugs. Because that will make Racket-on-Chez better, sooner, for everyone. One tip, if you haven't used the snapshots before (I hadn't): I've switched to installing my own packages in "--scope user" rather than "--scope installation". This keeps the packages out of the snapshot folder, so the snapshot can be easily replaced without disturbing the rest. To infinity and beyond. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
